Its perspective at the sharp end of ITIL projects means APM Group is well placed to see the benefits of implementing ITIL. Jessica Barry, APMG’s accreditor co-ordinator, explains why ITIL is still an extremely useful business tool and Version 3 is exactly what the industry needs to continue improving.
The issues surrounding ITIL and service management generate some heated debates. On this website alone there are lots of examples of people who are pro-ITIL and evangelise on its benefits, but there are just as many who think it is removed from the working realities faced by service providers.
The APM Group has the role of accreditor for the ITIL scheme. We accredit the examination institutes who work with training companies who in turn help end users adopt and embed ITIL. We also manage the examination scheme, so we are well placed to understand the debate about ITIL, and answer some of the more burning questions that people are discussing.
Our view, naturally, is that ITIL is an extremely useful method, especially with the added dimensions offered by Version 3. Our latest figures show that about 500,000 V3 certificates have been issued to candidates and every month there are more candidates taking the qualifications than the previous month. The international appeal of ITIL V3 is also extending, and we have translated papers into 20 languages. Translations are triggered when there is demand – usually measured by a significant number of Foundation examinations in a particular country. itSMF’s international chapters push for translations when they’ve got candidates asking for them – this in itself is a testament to ITIL’s value.
Demand for ITIL Masters
We are currently formulating the ITIL Master level of the certification scheme. The ITIL Master is a high level qualification where candidates demonstrate practical application of their ITIL knowledge. At Expert level you need to prove you know the guidance and the processes, but Masters goes further. The IT service management industry told us they needed and wanted the Masters qualification because this level of maturity was missing in previous schemes.
We’ve got several ITIL experts devising the certification including: Sharon Taylor, Dave Cannon, Kevin Holland, Carol Hulm, Dave Wheeldon, and Vernon Lloyd. They all have a wealth of experience in assessing individuals and defining what constitutes a robust and skilled ITIL knowledge and experience base. We expect Masters to be widely available from mid 2011.
First hand ITIL experience
One of the candidates taking part in the Masters Pilots is Mathieu Mathieu Notéris, senior ITSM consultant at Sogeti Belux, a provider of IT services in Belgium and Luxembourg. Sogeti helps clients develop, implement and manage practical IT solutions and Mathieu believes ITIL certifications are the evidence that you are able ‘to do IT’. He got involved in the pilots because he wanted ‘to stay on top of the wave’ and believes the qualifications give service managers credibility. Mathieu particularly likes the fact that the ITIL Masters level is based on the candidate’s real-life experience of service management.
“If you are a manager or high-level senior consultant this is a way to establish your own value based on real-life, proven experience and not just on an artificial business cases as was the case with the Service Manager certification from Version 2. Results and evidence are there. Lessons learned are real. To argue, convince and therefore manage, you definitely need to be convinced yourself,” Mathieu says.
But he doesn’t think ITIL is just about the process and says we shouldn’t forget that behind the machines, the programmes, the business and the processes, there are human beings. He says service management is as much about the discussions, factoring in different opinions, confronting issues, persuading and being persuaded, as it is about process.
He advises service managers to take all the opportunities open to them to enhance their learning and try to remember all lessons: both positive as well as negative. “One remembered bad situation is a situation you’ll be able to detect, recognise and hopefully avoid in the future,” he says.
More evidence
There are many testimonials of organizations which have benefited from ITIL. Recently on ServiceDesk360, Muller Dairy’s head of IT, Stephen Kane, talked about how ITIL helped turn the IT department into a first class internal service provider, exceeding each one of its KPIs and inspiring the rest of the business with its drive for continuous improvement practices.
In this paper, Maggie Kneller discusses how:
• A nationwide retail organization made savings in excess of £600,000 per annum by adopting service strategy practices for its financial management.
• An organisation identified that most of the cost of delivering IT support came from resolving customer issues. By adopting ITIL approaches to knowledge-based information and self-help, it was able to reduce costs of support by over 75 per cent while at the same time increasing user satisfaction with the service, and improving user productivity.
• A medium-sized IT service organisation invested €2.6m in a two-year programme to improve its IT service management. It recouped the investment within the first year, and achieved annual savings of €3.5m mainly through rationalizing unused and under-used resources (people, software licences, IT hardware etc). It also reduced IT incident resolution times and improved customer satisfaction by over 11 per cent.
• A large multinational company made annual savings of £5m by introducing ITIL service design practices to its IT supplier management.
There are countless examples of ITIL helping organisations, and we have been working recently with some well-known international organisations to share their experiences of using ITIL. We’ll be publishing those in time for itSMF’s UK conference on 8-9th November. We agree that ITIL is not a means to an end; it is just one of the many tools that can be used to improve IT service management. And while candidate numbers don’t show how ITIL is being used in the workplace, nor how effective it is, the fact that candidates want to take the qualifications, and go through the scheme as they progress through their careers, is surely telling us that ITIL is valid and useful.
Jessica Barry joined APM Group in 2006, two years after completing a degree in business management. I report directly to the CEO and am responsible for dealing with the day-to-day issues as the Accreditor and coordinating the scheme development, including examinations and accreditation.












ITIL and user productivity? Since when? Google the two terms and all you’ll find are vendors’ claims for their products and Maggie Kneller’s unsubstantiated contention. I’ve been ranting on these pages and others for years that user productivity is the very raison d’etre of user support – and this now just looks like ITIL’s Johnny-come-lately “me too”. Caveat lector – do not accept claims like those in this article at face value. If you achieve user productivity improvements while implementing ITIL, it will be either by your own deliberate design or a happy coincidence, because ITIL does not show you in any specific terms how to do that. It can only be done by applications design, user training or measurable improvements in second line service level practices, all of which are ancillary to ITIL. In my experience, and perhaps of those who attempted to sell us ‘E-support’ a few years ago, user ‘self-help’ actually decreases user productivity by distracting them from their primary purpose – which is why the idea bombed last time it was tried. Noel Bruton support consultant and author ‘Managing the IT Services Process’, www.noelbruton.com
Noel, ITIL has never claimed to tell anyone how to manage IT support, but surely the point here is that the ‘happy coincidence’ as you describe it only occurs once ITIL gives businesses an approach and a common language to begin exploring the miniature of their IT services? Isn’t that the point of ITIL, not a prescribed set of guaranteed outcomes?
James West
ServiceDesk360 editor
There is zero evidence of benefit of ITIL over that of a placebo. Working on your IT processes will make things better. True. Does it have to be ITIL? No. You could use MOF or FITS or COBIT or CMMI-SVC or USMBOK… or astrology http://www.itskeptic.org/node/388
I usually steer clear of these opinion blogs – as it’s all very much that – just opinions voiced.
I’m with James in essence……when I was in short pants ITSM processes like problem & change mgmt helped me make Citibank IT Services better and worked well in concert with my then helpdesk. It’s all about having a focus for our passion for service and getting some control over random problems, changes, incidents, etc………..
Just like service desks and customer service now, we all know they are generally good for our organisations, but as for actually PROVING it conclusively it’s pretty difficult. Thats why we’re always the cinderellas when it comes to budget!
The ‘ITIL wave’ of the past few years has seen many disappear up their own bottoms with the detail, if they re-emerge and focus on the passion and principles behind ITIL, ITSM, Six-sigma or any of the quality improvement or customer service methodologies, it WILL drive improvements when adopted with the right behaviours and attitudes.
If you spent as much on your people development as you do on ITIL or the latest technology you’d notice the difference……….
IT Skeptic. Thanks for your input.
Not sure about your analogy however; if ITIL is a placebo as you describe it, surely the same is true of COBIT, FITS etc? Surely ITIL and the other similar frameworks offer some decent guidance?
James West
Howard. Some good points well made there. I’m convinced that the problem is not the frameworks, it’s the hyperbole surrounding them with ITIL being the most striking example of this dynamic.
James West
I will say that ISO 20000 bring a lot of empowerment to ITIL since now companies has the option to measure and prove what they are doing.
With respect, the heartbeat of (IT) service is the customer, the outcomes they want to achieve, the experience they have using services, regardless of the type. Service management is about serving the customer. ITIL is a valuable contribution – but only one of the sources of meaningful guidance for service management.
There is currently a huge difference between the definition of IT Service Management (ITSM) and service management as used outside of IT.
The sooner the ITIL folks get this the more likely it will be valued for what it helps do – and less it will be criticized for what it does not.
James
I agree ITIL (and other frameworks) are not pure placebo. I use them myself daily in my consulting work.
My point is that there is a significant component that does NOT come from the frameworks, that is independent of them, that comes from the people and organisational aspects. As Howard put it “If you spent as much on your people development as you do on ITIL or the latest technology you’d notice the difference…”
Put another way, ITIL is not magic. But so many, especially mangers, think it is. “We’re doing ITIL” is an incantation that they believe makes their problems go away. Or another variant “We did Incident Management in a week” (true quote). Magic spell. Silver bullet.
There is only a limited inherent value in ITIL (almost all the inherent value is in standardisation of language). Culture change works with or without ITIL. in fact ITIL has very little to say about culture change outside the narrow bounds of process improvement.
That is what I meant with my astrology jest.